1
0
mirror of https://github.com/hsoft/collapseos.git synced 2024-11-20 23:28:05 +11:00
collapseos/apps/forth/stack.asm
Virgil Dupras 03e529b762 forth: simplify execution model and handle literals better
This scheme of "when we handle line-by-line, compile one word at a time then
execute" so that we could allow words like "CREATE" to call "readword" before
continuing was a bad scheme. It made things like branching outside of a colon
definition impossible.

This commit implement a new "litWord". When an undefined word is encountered at
compile time, it is included as-is in a string literal word. It is at run time
that we decide what to do with it.
2020-03-09 14:14:26 -04:00

43 lines
1.1 KiB
NASM

; The Parameter stack (PS) is maintained by SP and the Return stack (RS) is
; maintained by IX. This allows us to generally use push and pop freely because
; PS is the most frequently used. However, this causes a problem with routine
; calls: because in Forth, the stack isn't balanced within each call, our return
; offset, when placed by a CALL, messes everything up. This is one of the
; reasons why we need stack management routines below. IX always points to RS'
; Top Of Stack (TOS)
;
; This return stack contain "Interpreter pointers", that is a pointer to the
; address of a word, as seen in a compiled list of words.
; Push value HL to RS
pushRS:
inc ix
inc ix
ld (ix), l
ld (ix+1), h
ret
; Pop RS' TOS to HL
popRS:
ld l, (ix)
ld h, (ix+1)
dec ix
dec ix
ret
; Verifies that SP is within bounds. If it's not, call ABORT
chkPS:
ld hl, (INITIAL_SP)
; We have the return address for this very call on the stack. Let's
; compensate
dec hl \ dec hl
or a ; clear carry
sbc hl, sp
ret nc ; (INITIAL_SP) >= SP? good
; underflow
ld hl, .msg
call printstr
jp abort
.msg:
.db "stack underflow", 0