mirror of
https://github.com/hsoft/collapseos.git
synced 2024-12-26 14:08:05 +11:00
80891d7ec1
This should help with the bootstrapping of non-emulated environment. For example, I have a problem with the RC2014: I can't send it bootstrap info until the ACIA is up. I need to find a way...
151 lines
5.5 KiB
Plaintext
151 lines
5.5 KiB
Plaintext
Collapse OS' Forth implementation notes
|
|
|
|
*** EXECUTION MODEL
|
|
|
|
After having read a line through readln, we want to interpret it. As a general
|
|
rule, we go like this:
|
|
|
|
1. read single word from line
|
|
2. Can we find the word in dict?
|
|
3. If yes, execute that word, goto 1
|
|
4. Is it a number?
|
|
5. If yes, push that number to PS, goto 1
|
|
6. Error: undefined word.
|
|
|
|
*** EXECUTING A WORD
|
|
|
|
At it's core, executing a word is pushing the wordref on PS and calling EXECUTE.
|
|
Then, we let the word do its things. Some words are special, but most of them
|
|
are of the compiledWord type, and that's their execution that we describe here.
|
|
|
|
First of all, at all time during execution, the Interpreter Pointer (IP) points
|
|
to the wordref we're executing next.
|
|
|
|
When we execute a compiledWord, the first thing we do is push IP to the Return
|
|
Stack (RS). Therefore, RS' top of stack will contain a wordref to execute next,
|
|
after we EXIT.
|
|
|
|
At the end of every compiledWord is an EXIT. This pops RS, sets IP to it, and
|
|
continues.
|
|
|
|
*** Stack management
|
|
|
|
The Parameter stack (PS) is maintained by SP and the Return stack (RS) is
|
|
maintained by IX. This allows us to generally use push and pop freely because PS
|
|
is the most frequently used. However, this causes a problem with routine calls:
|
|
because in Forth, the stack isn't balanced within each call, our return offset,
|
|
when placed by a CALL, messes everything up. This is one of the reasons why we
|
|
need stack management routines below. IX always points to RS' Top Of Stack (TOS)
|
|
|
|
This return stack contain "Interpreter pointers", that is a pointer to the
|
|
address of a word, as seen in a compiled list of words.
|
|
|
|
*** Dictionary
|
|
|
|
A dictionary entry has this structure:
|
|
|
|
- Xb name. Arbitrary long number of character (but can't be bigger than
|
|
input buffer, of course). not null-terminated
|
|
- 2b prev offset
|
|
- 1b size + IMMEDIATE flag
|
|
- 2b code pointer
|
|
- Parameter field (PF)
|
|
|
|
The prev offset is the number of bytes between the prev field and the previous
|
|
word's code pointer.
|
|
|
|
The size + flag indicate the size of the name field, with the 7th bit being the
|
|
IMMEDIATE flag.
|
|
|
|
The code pointer point to "word routines". These routines expect to be called
|
|
with IY pointing to the PF. They themselves are expected to end by jumping to
|
|
the address at (IP). They will usually do so with "jp next".
|
|
|
|
That's for "regular" words (words that are part of the dict chain). There are
|
|
also "special words", for example NUMBER, LIT, FBR, that have a slightly
|
|
different structure. They're also a pointer to an executable, but as for the
|
|
other fields, the only one they have is the "flags" field.
|
|
|
|
*** System variables
|
|
|
|
There are some core variables in the core system that are referred to directly
|
|
by their address in memory throughout the code. The place where they live is
|
|
configurable by the RAMSTART constant in conf.fs, but their relative offset is
|
|
not. In fact, they're mostlly referred to directly as their numerical offset
|
|
along with a comment indicating what this offset refers to.
|
|
|
|
This system is a bit fragile because every time we change those offsets, we
|
|
have to be careful to adjust all system variables offsets, but thankfully,
|
|
there aren't many system variables. Here's a list of them:
|
|
|
|
RAMSTART INITIAL_SP
|
|
+02 CURRENT
|
|
+04 HERE
|
|
+06 IP
|
|
+08 FLAGS
|
|
+0a PARSEPTR
|
|
+0c CINPTR
|
|
+0e WORDBUF
|
|
+2e SYSVNXT
|
|
+4e INTJUMP
|
|
+51 SYSTEM SCRATCHPAD
|
|
+60 RAMEND
|
|
|
|
INITIAL_SP holds the initial Stack Pointer value so that we know where to reset
|
|
it on ABORT
|
|
|
|
CURRENT points to the last dict entry.
|
|
|
|
HERE points to current write offset.
|
|
|
|
IP is the Interpreter Pointer
|
|
|
|
FLAGS holds global flags. Only used for prompt output control for now.
|
|
|
|
PARSEPTR holds routine address called on (parse)
|
|
|
|
CINPTR holds routine address called on C<
|
|
|
|
WORDBUF is the buffer used by WORD
|
|
|
|
SYSVNXT is the buffer+tracker used by (sysv)
|
|
|
|
INTJUMP All RST offsets (well, not *all* at this moment, I still have to free
|
|
those slots...) in boot binaries are made to jump to this address. If you use
|
|
one of those slots for an interrupt, write a jump to the appropriate offset in
|
|
that RAM location.
|
|
|
|
SYSTEM SCRATCHPAD is reserved for temporary system storage.
|
|
|
|
*** Initialization sequence
|
|
|
|
On boot, we jump to the "main" routine in boot.fs which does very few things.
|
|
It sets up the SP register, CURRENT and HERE to LATEST (saved in stable ABI),
|
|
then look for the BOOT word and calls it.
|
|
|
|
In a normal system, BOOT is in icore and does a few things:
|
|
|
|
1. Find "(parse)" and set "(parse*)" to it.
|
|
2. Find "(c<)" a set CINPTR to it (what C< calls).
|
|
3. Write LATEST in SYSTEM SCRATCHPAD ( see below )
|
|
4. Find "INIT". If found, execute. Otherwise, execute "INTERPRET"
|
|
|
|
On a bare system (only boot+icore), this sequence will result in "(parse)"
|
|
reading only decimals and (c<) reading characters from memory starting from
|
|
CURRENT (this is why we put CURRENT in SYSTEM SCRATCHPAD, it tracks current
|
|
pos ).
|
|
|
|
This means that you can put initialization code in source form right into your
|
|
binary, right after your last compiled dict entry and it's going to be executed
|
|
as such until you set a new (c<).
|
|
|
|
Note that there is no EMIT in a bare system. You have to take care of supplying
|
|
one before your load core.fs and its higher levels.
|
|
|
|
Also note that this initialization code is fighting for space with HERE: New
|
|
entries to the dict will overwrite that code! Also, because we're barebone, we
|
|
can't have comments. This leads to peculiar code in this area. If you see weird
|
|
whitespace usage, it's probably because not using those whitespace would result
|
|
in dict entry creation overwriting the code before it has the chance to be
|
|
interpreted.
|