There is an alternate git history where I continued the Forth-ification of
words, including "SKIP?", but that was a bad idea: because that word was
written by flow control immediates, I stepped into quicksands where stability
became necessary in z80c.fs and I couldn't gracefully get out of it.
I'm stepping back and take this opportunity to replace the shoddy SKIP? algo
with a more straightforward (?br) implementation.
(br) and (?br) will always stay in boot code where it's easier manage a stable
ABI.
Otherwise, when a defining word would be called outside a definition
itself, it would get the name of the last parsed word, that is,
itself!
For example, dummy.fs, instead of creating a "_______" entry, created
a "(entry)" entry...
The commit ended up being much bigger than anticipated. This was a long thread
of underlying complexities. This lead to the creation of interesting concepts
such as (sysv).
